[INFOGRAPHIC] Life Science Brand Performance Report from BioInformatics, LLC
This report will help you to:
- Assess the degree of brand recognition, familiarity with and usage of life science instrumentation and equipment brands.
- Evaluate the brand equity of the life science instrumentation and equipment brands in terms of differentiation, relevance, quality, popularity and advantages.
- Determine whether a brand’s performance across these factors has improved or worsened over the past 18 to 24 months.
- Establish the most/least important factors considered when purchasing instruments and equipment from different brands.
- Measure level of satisfaction with a brand’s instrument and equipment offering across multiple attributes.
- Correlate the likelihood of customers to recommend a brand of life science instrumentation and equipment with satisfaction.
- Analyze degree of differentiation across brands on price, quality and innovation.
- Present a customer profile for multiple brands of life science instrumentation and equipment that features the key demographics of each brand’s most loyal and satisfied customers.
The following companies will be individually profiled in this report:
Roche Applied Science
BioInformatics LLC’s June 2013 report, Life Science Instrumentation: Brand Performance, is designed to help suppliers identify brand strengths and weaknesses and to provide direction as to how to differentiate instrumentation offerings. This report offers suppliers an unbiased assessment of how major brands are performing compared to their closest competitors. Based on the opinions of 1,367 life scientists worldwide, these insights can help create a “halo” effect surrounding a company’s products—creating excitement, allowing for premium pricing and generating goodwill that translates into future sales.
From the perspective of scientific consumers who use, recommend and/or buy instruments, this study analyzes how brands are perceived throughout the industry. Attributes such as brand recognition, popularity, relevance and differentiation are measured, along with the degree of loyalty scientists have toward specific brands of instruments—and why. Purchasing criteria is established, likelihood of recommending a brand to colleagues is explored and brands are compared side-by-side with regards to price, innovation and quality. Additionally, this study provides trending research about how major suppliers’ brands have been performing over the past 18-24 months.
Suppliers can use Life Science Instrumentation: Brand Performance to power up their brand strategies, to inform more accurate competitive analyses and to identify segments that are vulnerable to switching as a result of brand confusion or lack of differentiation. Plus, included in the report are detailed profiles of major suppliers’ brands. Not only do these profiles report on brand health, they also present the key demographics of each brand’s most loyal and satisfied customers. Life Science Instrumentation: Brand Performance contains the most current, comprehensive market research on life science instrumentation brands, and will help suppliers understand how their brands are ranked and how to position their offerings so that they can more aggressively capture market share.
Check out a Q&A with Dr. Robin Rothrock, Director of Publications at BioInformatics LLC
Key Findings Included